Is the Completionkit Evals MCP server down?

mcp-registry/com.completionkit/evals · v0.29.1

healthy
Last checked 2026-10-18 19:19 UTC · handshake 324ms

As of 2026-10-18 19:19 UTC, the Completionkit Evals MCP server is up with a Glimind reliability score of 93/100 (grade A). Over the last 30 days it answered 100% of Glimind's liveness checks. It had 6 outages in 90 days, with a median recovery of 2 minutes.

uptime (30d checks)
100%
checks observed
3,745
outages (90d)
6
tools
54

Prompt evals over MCP: run a prompt on your dataset, score each output 1-5 with an LLM judge.

Install Completionkit Evals MCP server

Add to Cursor Add to VS Code

Claude Code

claude mcp add --transport http completionkit-evals-mcp-server https://completionkit.com/mcp

Claude Desktop · Windsurf · Cline (mcpServers JSON)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "completionkit-evals-mcp-server": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://completionkit.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Third-party server, listed as discovered. Review its source before installing.

Agent-readiness: D (56/100)

D (56/100): 0 error(s), 6 warning(s) across 54 tool(s); ~6,797 tokens of tool definitions.
Scores higher than 0% of 15,309 MCP servers Glimind has audited.
Its tool list costs an agent ~6,797 tokens per session — more than 65% of servers.
56 → 56 since 2026-10-17
no tool-poisoning patterns
Schemas100
Descriptions9
Safety hints0
Token cost75
Client compatibility70
Protocol100
Reliability85
Stability88

What to fix (8)

54 of 54 tool(s) carry no readOnlyHint/destructiveHint annotations.

Annotate read-only tools with {"readOnlyHint": true}. Agents and gateways can then run them without a confirmation prompt, and route around destructive ones. How to fix →

Tools: agreements_create, agreements_list, datasets_create, datasets_create_from_url, datasets_delete and 49 more

54 tools on one server. Tool-selection accuracy drops as the menu grows, and some clients (e.g. Cursor) cap the number of active tools.

Group tools by task into smaller servers or toolsets, and merge near-duplicates behind one tool with a mode parameter. How to fix →

111 parameter(s) across 43 tool(s) have no description.

Add a "description" to each parameter with its format and an example ("ISO 8601 date, e.g. 2026-10-17"). This is the commonest cause of wrong arguments on the first call. How to fix →

Tools: agreements_create, agreements_list, datasets_create, datasets_create_from_url, datasets_delete and 38 more

29 tool(s) look like they change state (create/send/delete/pay…) but declare no destructiveHint.

Set annotations {"readOnlyHint": false, "destructiveHint": true|false, "idempotentHint": …}. Clients use these to ask the user before a side effect and to auto-approve safe reads. How to fix →

Tools: agreements_create, datasets_create, datasets_create_from_url, datasets_delete, datasets_update and 24 more

17 tool(s) have descriptions under 20 characters.

Say when to use the tool and what it returns, not just its name restated ("Get weather" → "Current weather for a city: temperature, conditions, wind. Use for 'now', not forecasts."). How to fix →

Tools: datasets_delete, datasets_get, datasets_list, datasets_update, metrics_delete and 12 more

Handshake + tools/list takes ~2,088 ms.

Serve tools/list from memory, keep the process warm, and host close to your users. Every new agent session pays this before its first call.

No tool declares an outputSchema.

Declare outputSchema and return structuredContent (MCP 2025-06-18+). Agents can then parse results without guessing, and chain tools reliably. How to fix →

In the last 30 days: 0 tool(s) removed and 3 schema change(s).

Add new tools or optional parameters instead of renaming or removing; deprecate first (say so in the description) and remove later. Agents cache tool contracts. How to fix →

Auto-fix: 50 corrected tool definitions

Paste-ready definitions with the problems above fixed. Changes marked verify need a human look. 43 tool(s) still need parameter descriptions written by someone who knows the API. All of them as JSON: /v1/readiness/mcp-registry%2Fcom.completionkit%2Fevals/fixes

agreements_create 1 change
{
  "name": "agreements_create",
  "description": "Upsert an agreement for (run, response, metric, created_by). Verdict is one of agree, disagree, borderline. corrected_score (1..5) is required when verdict is 'disagree'.",
  "inputSchema": {
    "type": "object",
    "required": [
      "run_id",
      "response_id",
      "metric_id",
      "verdict"
    ],
    "properties": {
      "note": {
        "type": "string"
      },
      "run_id": {
        "type": "integer"
      },
      "verdict": {
        "enum": [
          "agree",
          "disagree",
          "borderline"
        ],
        "type": "string"
      },
      "metric_id": {
        "type": "integer"
      },
      "created_by": {
        "type": "string"
      },
      "response_id": {
        "type": "integer"
      },
      "corrected_score": {
        "type": "number"
      }
    }
  },
  "annotations": {
    "readOnlyHint": false,
    "destructiveHint": false,
    "idempotentHint": false
  }
}
agreements_list 1 change
{
  "name": "agreements_list",
  "description": "List agreements. Filter by run_id, response_id, metric_id, or created_by.",
  "inputSchema": {
    "type": "object",
    "required": [],
    "properties": {
      "run_id": {
        "type": "integer"
      },
      "metric_id": {
        "type": "integer"
      },
      "created_by": {
        "type": "string"
      },
      "response_id": {
        "type": "integer"
      }
    }
  },
  "annotations": {
    "readOnlyHint": true
  }
}
datasets_create 1 change
{
  "name": "datasets_create",
  "description": "Create a dataset with CSV data. First row is the header. Two column names are recognized specially: \"expected_output\" is each row's answer key (ground truth) given to the judge and to checks that compare against the row's expected value, and \"actual_output\" is a pre-made output to score in a prompt-less run. Both are overridable per run (expected_column / output_column). Every column is also available to the prompt as a variable.",
  "inputSchema": {
    "type": "object",
    "required": [
      "name",
      "csv_data"
    ],
    "properties": {
      "name": {
        "type": "string"
      },
      "csv_data": {
        "type": "string"
      },
      "tag_names": {
        "type": "array",
        "items": {
          "type": "string"
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "annotations": {
    "readOnlyHint": false,
    "destructiveHint": false,
    "idempotentHint": false
  }
}

Get alerted

Get an email or webhook when this server's readiness drops by 10+ points, tool-poisoning text appears, or a tool breaks:

curl -X POST https://glimind.com/v1/subscriptions -H 'content-type: application/json' -d '{"tools":["mcp-registry/com.completionkit/evals"],"email":"[email protected]"}'

Agents: watch_tool({"toolId": "mcp-registry/com.completionkit/evals"}) over MCP.

Passed

Largest tool definitions

Static checks of the advertised tools/list (schema, descriptions, annotations, tool-poisoning patterns, names, size) plus observed protocol, uptime, latency and contract changes. Read-only: no tool is ever called. Weights: schema 15, docs 20, safety 15, efficiency 15, compatibility 15, protocol 5, reliability 10, stability 5. Token counts are estimates (~3.6 characters per token).

Operator? Fix these, then re-check live. Embed the readiness badge:

Markdown
[![MCP agent-readiness](https://glimind.com/v1/readiness/badge/mcp-registry%2Fcom.completionkit%2Fevals.svg)](https://glimind.com/server/mcp-registry%2Fcom.completionkit%2Fevals?ref=badge)
HTML
<a href="https://glimind.com/server/mcp-registry%2Fcom.completionkit%2Fevals?ref=badge"><img src="https://glimind.com/v1/readiness/badge/mcp-registry%2Fcom.completionkit%2Fevals.svg" alt="MCP agent-readiness"></a>
reStructuredText
.. image:: https://glimind.com/v1/readiness/badge/mcp-registry%2Fcom.completionkit%2Fevals.svg
   :target: https://glimind.com/server/mcp-registry%2Fcom.completionkit%2Fevals?ref=badge
   :alt: MCP agent-readiness

Tool-definition log

Glimind records every version of this server's tool definitions in a signed, append-only transparency log. Current manifest sha256:f98b426f7e0176ee…, first seen 2026-10-17, included at leaf 14814 of 23,166. Version history · verify what your client received.

Tools (54)

Compare: most reliable ml servers · most reliable data servers · most reliable other servers · most reliable knowledge servers · most reliable security servers

Know before your agent calls it

Glimind tells agents whether a server is up right now and how to call it, then fails over to a live alternative when it isn't.

Add Glimind — free, no signup:

Add to Cursor Add to VS Code

Claude Code

claude mcp add --transport http glimind https://glimind.com/mcp

Claude Desktop · Windsurf · Cline (mcpServers JSON)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "glimind": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://glimind.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

FAQ

Is the Completionkit Evals MCP server down right now?

As of 2026-10-18 19:19 UTC, the Completionkit Evals MCP server is up with a Glimind reliability score of 93/100 (grade A). Over the last 30 days it answered 100% of Glimind's liveness checks. It had 6 outages in 90 days, with a median recovery of 2 minutes.

How many tools does Completionkit Evals MCP server provide?

Completionkit Evals MCP server advertises 54 tools, including agreements_create, agreements_list, datasets_create, datasets_create_from_url, datasets_delete.

How do I install Completionkit Evals MCP server?

Point your MCP client at this streamable-http endpoint: https://completionkit.com/mcp

Is the Completionkit Evals MCP server safe to connect to an AI agent?

Glimind scanned all 54 tool definitions for tool-poisoning patterns — hidden or invisible characters, instructions that override the model, concealment from the user, requests to read credential or MCP config files, conversation exfiltration and cross-tool shadowing — and found none. This checks what the server tells the model, not what its code does; review the source before granting access to sensitive data.

Operator of Completionkit Evals MCP server?

Status page: 90-day uptime, every outage and how long it lasted.

Claim this listing to get the Verified operator marker, a remediation checklist and owner analytics, or embed the live badge from any of the tool pages above. Maintainers: alerts, deploy attestation and monthly reports.

Status is an automated estimate from Glimind's liveness checks (handshake and tool listing only; no tool is ever called) and may lag or differ from your network. Glimind is not affiliated with this server or its operator. Operator? Request a correction or opt out at https://glimind.com/opt-out.