Is the Wygogogo19 Robotbase MCP server down?

mcp-registry/io.github.wygogogo19/robotbase-mcp · v0.12.2

healthy
Last checked 2026-10-18 05:02 UTC · handshake 383ms

As of 2026-10-18 05:02 UTC, the Wygogogo19 Robotbase MCP server is up with a Glimind reliability score of 75/100 (grade B). Over the last 30 days it answered 99.6% of Glimind's liveness checks. It had 12 outages in 90 days, with a median recovery of 7 minutes.

uptime (30d checks)
99.6%
checks observed
3,693
outages (90d)
12
tools
45

Read-only MCP for BTC, ETH, XMR and ZEC: fees, nodes, p2pool, shielded pools.

Install Wygogogo19 Robotbase MCP server

Add to Cursor Add to VS Code

Claude Code

claude mcp add --transport http wygogogo19-robotbase-mcp-server https://robotbase.cc/mcp

Claude Desktop · Windsurf · Cline (mcpServers JSON)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "wygogogo19-robotbase-mcp-server": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://robotbase.cc/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Third-party server, listed as discovered. Review its source before installing.

Agent-readiness: D (69/100)

D (69/100): 0 error(s), 7 warning(s) across 45 tool(s); ~8,906 tokens of tool definitions.
Scores higher than 5% of 15,348 MCP servers Glimind has audited.
Its tool list costs an agent ~8,906 tokens per session — more than 65% of servers.
69 → 69 since 2026-10-17
no tool-poisoning patterns
Schemas88
Descriptions85
Safety hints16
Token cost75
Client compatibility70
Protocol100
Reliability85
Stability20

What to fix (8)

45 of 45 tool(s) carry no readOnlyHint/destructiveHint annotations.

Annotate read-only tools with {"readOnlyHint": true}. Agents and gateways can then run them without a confirmation prompt, and route around destructive ones. How to fix →

Tools: base_check_contract_risk, broadcast_raw_transaction, btc_get_address, btc_get_block, btc_get_fee_rates and 40 more

45 tools on one server. Tool-selection accuracy drops as the menu grows, and some clients (e.g. Cursor) cap the number of active tools.

Group tools by task into smaller servers or toolsets, and merge near-duplicates behind one tool with a mode parameter. How to fix →

3 parameter(s) across 3 tool(s) have no description.

Add a "description" to each parameter with its format and an example ("ISO 8601 date, e.g. 2026-10-17"). This is the commonest cause of wrong arguments on the first call. How to fix →

Tools: broadcast_raw_transaction, eth_read_contract, tron_read_contract

2 tool(s) have parameters with no type (no type/enum/anyOf/$ref).

Give every parameter a "type" (or "enum"/"anyOf"). Untyped parameters make models guess — strings for numbers, objects for arrays. How to fix →

Tools: eth_get_block, eth_get_logs

2 tool(s) look like they change state (create/send/delete/pay…) but declare no destructiveHint.

Set annotations {"readOnlyHint": false, "destructiveHint": true|false, "idempotentHint": …}. Clients use these to ask the user before a side effect and to auto-approve safe reads. How to fix →

Tools: tron_verify_usdt_transfer, xmr_verify_payment

Handshake + tools/list takes ~2,586 ms.

Serve tools/list from memory, keep the process warm, and host close to your users. Every new agent session pays this before its first call.

In the last 30 days: 24 tool(s) removed and 9 schema change(s).

Add new tools or optional parameters instead of renaming or removing; deprecate first (say so in the description) and remove later. Agents cache tool contracts. How to fix →

No tool declares an outputSchema.

Declare outputSchema and return structuredContent (MCP 2025-06-18+). Agents can then parse results without guessing, and chain tools reliably. How to fix →

Auto-fix: 42 corrected tool definitions

Paste-ready definitions with the problems above fixed. Changes marked verify need a human look. 3 tool(s) still need parameter descriptions written by someone who knows the API. All of them as JSON: /v1/readiness/mcp-registry%2Fio.github.wygogogo19%2Frobotbase-mcp/fixes

base_check_contract_risk 1 change
{
  "name": "base_check_contract_risk",
  "description": "Base (EVM) token and contract risk screen: honeypot, transfer taxes, verified source, backdoors and liquidity lock. When to use: before an agent trades, quotes or accepts a token on Base, or when an address shows up in an AgentKit / onchain-agent flow and you need the hard facts first - can it be sold, what does the exit cost, who can change the rules. Do not use: for Solana mints (that is sol_check_token_safety) or for TRON addresses (tron_check_address_risk); it does not simulate a live sell. ",
  "inputSchema": {
    "type": "object",
    "anyOf": [
      {
        "required": [
          "contract"
        ]
      },
      {
        "required": [
          "address"
        ]
      }
    ],
    "properties": {
      "address": {
        "type": "string",
        "description": "Alias for `contract` - accepted so a generic agent can pass `address`."
      },
      "contract": {
        "type": "string",
        "description": "Base ERC-20 / contract address (0x + 40 hex). Preferred name."
      }
    },
    "additionalProperties": false
  },
  "annotations": {
    "readOnlyHint": true
  }
}
btc_get_address 1 change
{
  "name": "btc_get_address",
  "description": "Balance and activity of a Bitcoin address, with no key involved. When to use: reconciling a merchant wallet, or checking whether an address received funds and how active it is. Do not use: we do not label or risk-score addresses; for a single payment use btc_get_transaction. Returns: address, confirmed/unconfirmed balance, utxo count and total, tx count, last 10 transactions. Supports P2PKH (1..), P2SH (3..), bech32 (bc1q..), bech32m (bc1p..). Ultra-active addresses may return a degraded=true re",
  "inputSchema": {
    "type": "object",
    "required": [
      "address"
    ],
    "properties": {
      "address": {
        "type": "string",
        "description": "Bitcoin mainnet address"
      }
    },
    "additionalProperties": false
  },
  "annotations": {
    "readOnlyHint": false,
    "destructiveHint": false,
    "idempotentHint": false
  }
}
btc_get_block 1 change
{
  "name": "btc_get_block",
  "description": "Bitcoin block summary by height or hash; omit both for the chain tip. When to use: an overview of a block, or confirming which block a payment landed in. Do not use: to fetch a single payment (that is btc_get_transaction). Returns: hash, height, time, txs, size, weight, confirmations, previousblockhash.",
  "inputSchema": {
    "type": "object",
    "properties": {
      "height": {
        "type": "integer",
        "description": "Block height (optional)"
      },
      "blockhash": {
        "type": "string",
        "description": "Block hash (optional; use instead of height)"
      }
    },
    "additionalProperties": false
  },
  "annotations": {
    "readOnlyHint": true
  }
}

Get alerted

Get an email or webhook when this server's readiness drops by 10+ points, tool-poisoning text appears, or a tool breaks:

curl -X POST https://glimind.com/v1/subscriptions -H 'content-type: application/json' -d '{"tools":["mcp-registry/io.github.wygogogo19/robotbase-mcp"],"email":"[email protected]"}'

Agents: watch_tool({"toolId": "mcp-registry/io.github.wygogogo19/robotbase-mcp"}) over MCP.

Passed

Largest tool definitions

Static checks of the advertised tools/list (schema, descriptions, annotations, tool-poisoning patterns, names, size) plus observed protocol, uptime, latency and contract changes. Read-only: no tool is ever called. Weights: schema 15, docs 20, safety 15, efficiency 15, compatibility 15, protocol 5, reliability 10, stability 5. Token counts are estimates (~3.6 characters per token).

Operator? Fix these, then re-check live. Embed the readiness badge:

Markdown
[![MCP agent-readiness](https://glimind.com/v1/readiness/badge/mcp-registry%2Fio.github.wygogogo19%2Frobotbase-mcp.svg)](https://glimind.com/server/mcp-registry%2Fio.github.wygogogo19%2Frobotbase-mcp?ref=badge)
HTML
<a href="https://glimind.com/server/mcp-registry%2Fio.github.wygogogo19%2Frobotbase-mcp?ref=badge"><img src="https://glimind.com/v1/readiness/badge/mcp-registry%2Fio.github.wygogogo19%2Frobotbase-mcp.svg" alt="MCP agent-readiness"></a>
reStructuredText
.. image:: https://glimind.com/v1/readiness/badge/mcp-registry%2Fio.github.wygogogo19%2Frobotbase-mcp.svg
   :target: https://glimind.com/server/mcp-registry%2Fio.github.wygogogo19%2Frobotbase-mcp?ref=badge
   :alt: MCP agent-readiness

Tool-definition log

Glimind records every version of this server's tool definitions in a signed, append-only transparency log. Current manifest sha256:724dead069942fd0…, first seen 2026-10-17, included at leaf 17664 of 20,401. Version history · verify what your client received.

Tools (45)

Compare: most reliable security servers · most reliable data servers · most reliable other servers · most reliable devops servers · most reliable blockchain servers

Know before your agent calls it

Glimind tells agents whether a server is up right now and how to call it, then fails over to a live alternative when it isn't.

Add Glimind — free, no signup:

Add to Cursor Add to VS Code

Claude Code

claude mcp add --transport http glimind https://glimind.com/mcp

Claude Desktop · Windsurf · Cline (mcpServers JSON)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "glimind": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://glimind.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

FAQ

Is the Wygogogo19 Robotbase MCP server down right now?

As of 2026-10-18 05:02 UTC, the Wygogogo19 Robotbase MCP server is up with a Glimind reliability score of 75/100 (grade B). Over the last 30 days it answered 99.6% of Glimind's liveness checks. It had 12 outages in 90 days, with a median recovery of 7 minutes.

How many tools does Wygogogo19 Robotbase MCP server provide?

Wygogogo19 Robotbase MCP server advertises 45 tools, including base_check_contract_risk, broadcast_raw_transaction, btc_get_address, btc_get_block, btc_get_fee_rates.

How do I install Wygogogo19 Robotbase MCP server?

Point your MCP client at this streamable-http endpoint: https://robotbase.cc/mcp

Is the Wygogogo19 Robotbase MCP server safe to connect to an AI agent?

Glimind scanned all 45 tool definitions for tool-poisoning patterns — hidden or invisible characters, instructions that override the model, concealment from the user, requests to read credential or MCP config files, conversation exfiltration and cross-tool shadowing — and found none. This checks what the server tells the model, not what its code does; review the source before granting access to sensitive data.

Operator of Wygogogo19 Robotbase MCP server?

Status page: 90-day uptime, every outage and how long it lasted.

Claim this listing to get the Verified operator marker, a remediation checklist and owner analytics, or embed the live badge from any of the tool pages above. Maintainers: alerts, deploy attestation and monthly reports.

Status is an automated estimate from Glimind's liveness checks (handshake and tool listing only; no tool is ever called) and may lag or differ from your network. Glimind is not affiliated with this server or its operator. Operator? Request a correction or opt out at https://glimind.com/opt-out.